Sunday, July 28, 2013

Week 5 - Questionnaires and Review of Literature!

This week has included a lot of reading!  I was instructed to create a questionnaire about a music education topic.  The questionnaire could be given to adults because we don't have access to students in a classroom over the summer.  I wracked my brain for a subject and went through many of them before settling on the subjects of stage fright.  I have a lot of friends and family who have dealt with stage fright in various forms over the years.  After settling on the topic of stage fright and possible cures for stage fright, I read Chapter 7: How to Construct a Questionnaire from the text, "Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods Fourth Edition" by Burke Johnson and Larry Christensen.

Johnson and Christensen define a questionnaire as "a self-report data-collection instrument that each research participant fills out as part of a research study" (162).  A questionnaire is like a survey in that it allows the participant to answer questions about a certain topic.  There are two different types of questions that might appear in a questionnaire: open-ended questions and closed-ended questions.  An open-ended question is a question that allows the participant to answer freely, like a short answer question.  A closed-ended question provides a set number of answers and the participant must choose one answer.

Johnson and Christensen state 15 principles of Questionnaire Construction:
1) Make sure the questionnaire items match your research objectives.
2) Understand your research participants.
3) Use natural and familiar language.
4) Write items that are clear, precise, and relatively short.
5) Do not use "leading" or "loaded" questions. (A loaded question is "one that contains emotionally charged words" while a leading question is "one that is phrased in such a way that it suggests a certain answer" (166-167)).
6) Avoid double-barreled questions. (A double-barreled questions "combines 2 or more issues or attitude objects in a single item" (168)).
7) Avoid double negatives.
8) Determine whether an open-ended question or a closed-ended question is needed.
9) Use mutually exclusive and exhaustive response categories for closed-ended questions.
10) Consider the different types of response categories available for closed-ended questionnaire items.
11) Use multiple items to measure abstract constructs.
12) Consider using multiple methods when measuring abstract constructs.
13) Use caution if you reverse the wording in some of the items to prevent response sets in multi-item scales.
14) Develop a questionnaire that is properly organized and easy for the participant to use.
15) Always pilot test your questionnaire.

With these 15 principles in mind, I created the following questionnaire about stage fright:


Stage Fright
Hello and thank you for taking the time to fill out this questionnaire.  Everyone deals with stage fright at some point in their life.  Whether it’s the feeling of slight anxiety before you step onto the stage or the experience of chest pain, most people have experienced one of the symptoms once in their life.  Please take a few minutes to fill out the following questions to reflect upon your experiences with stage fright.  Remember, there is no right answer!

1. Do you have stage fright when you sing, dance, or perform an instrument in front of others? (Circle one)
Yes                  Sometimes                   Never

2. Do you have stage fright when you speak in front of other people? (Circle one)
Yes                  Sometimes                   Never


3.  Do you avoid, if at all possible, the chance to perform or speak in front of others? (Circle one)
Yes                  Sometimes                   Never

4. Do you feel uncontrollable anxiety when you perform or speak in front of others? (Circle one)
Yes                  Sometimes                   Never

5. Do you feel like you will lose control when you perform or speak in front of others? (Circle one)
Yes                  Sometimes                   Never

6. On a scale of 1 to 7; 1 being the least and 7 being the highest, please rate the level of anxiety you feel when you perform or speak in front of others.
1                      2                      3                      4                      5                      6                      7


7.  Do you experience any physical symptoms when you perform or speak in front of others?  If so, please circle all that apply:
Dizziness
Sweating of hands/palms
Shaking
Chest pain
Pounding of heart
Numbness
Other (please explain): ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


8.  Which of the following ways to cope with stage fright works best for you (circle one)?
Listening to music before you perform or speak in front of others.
Stretching before you perform or speak in front of others
Meditating before you perform or speak in front of others
Exercise before you perform or speak in front of others
Laugh before you perform or speak in front of others
Imagine the audience in their underwear as you perform or speak in front of others
Visualize success before you perform or speak in front of others
Visualize the words and/or notes in your head while you perform or speak in front of others
Pick a point on the far wall to stare at as you perform or speak in front of others
Pick 3 people in the audience to stare at as you perform or speak in front of others
Other (Please explain): ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


9. Gender (circle one):
Male                                        Female                         Prefer not to Answer

10. Race (circle one):
American Indian or Alaska Native       Asian               Black or African-American    
Hispanic or Latino                               White               Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
Prefer not to Answer

11. Age:
0-9
10-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80-89

90-100

Hopefully this survey allows me to gain some insight on the topic of stage fright and the possible cures.  This will allow me to work with my students who are afraid of performing in front of others in order to create a safe environment.

In addition to the questionnaire this week, I was charged with creating a review of literature on the topic of my research study proposal: Sight Singing in an Elementary Music Program.  I really wanted to research this topic because there are so many methods to teaching sight singing.  It would be interesting to see if there was a method that stood out from all the rest.  

I spent a great deal of time researching articles for this project.  I found that James L. Reifinger Jr. is a pioneer in this field and has done a number of studies on this subject.  He worked multiple times with second grade students because he determined that was the grade where most programs began their notation instruction.  He worked with the students multiple times.  In 2009, he worked with the students in determining whether or not patterns that were taken from songs the students had previously knew could be practiced using solfege and that would allow the students a chance to succeed when sight singing.  They took a prettest, posttest, and retention test.  In the tests, the items 1-15 were patterns practiced over a 16 week period and items 16-25 were unfamiliar to the students.  He found that the students did better on the familiar patterns.  This evidence shows that students should practice solfege in the classroom constantly.  The more they practice a certain solfege pattern, the better the student is able to sight sing that pattern!  In addition, in 2012 he did a similar study in second grade.  This time he wondered whether or not solfege was the best tool for students when sight singing or if singing on a neutral syllable such as "loo" would give them a greater chance for success.  In addition, he kept the familiar and unfamiliar patterns in order to further research is previous topic.  He split the students into 4 groups : solfege/familiar, solfege/unfamiliar, loo/familiar, and loo/unfamiliar.  He found that using solfege with familiar patterns once again yielded the best results.  But he also found that using solfege for unfamiliar patterns could sometimes be difficult because it was too much to concentrate on at the same time.  Because of that, using loo with unfamiliar patterns also had its benenfits!

Sunday, July 21, 2013

Week 4

In music therapy and music education, qualitative research is just one of three of the main types of behavior research.  Within the qualitative research genre, there are 4 basic characteristics:

1) noninterventionist - which is the observation in the natural settings,
2) interpretation - which is the interpretation of both EMIC issues (which are those of the participants) and of ETIC issues (those of the writer),
3) highly contextual description - of people and events, and
4) validation of information through triangulation.

The qualitative study utilizes words and narrative in order to tell the story.  According to Phillips, "the main outcome is to present a close-up picture of one participant of a small group of participants in relation to some criterion" (Phillips 83).

According to Phillips, the following are characteristics of qualitative research:
1) Natural Setting - the research takes place in a natural setting such as a classroom or a music therapist's office.
2) Multiple Methods of Data Collection - researchers must seek to build reliability and credibility with the individuals.  Data can be collected in numerous ways including openended observastions, interviews, and documents.
3) An Emerging Process - The research questions can change throughout the study as well as the data-collection process.
4) Multiple Strategies of Inquiry - researchers must use 1 or more strategies of investigation.
5) Fundamentally Interpretive - the researcher interprets the collected data.
6) Holistic View - a broad view.
7) Reflexivity of the Researcher - the study reflects on who the researcher is.
8) Complex, Cyclic Reasoning Process - utilizes complex reasoning.  The thinking is a cyclic process.

According to Phillips, in qualitative research, there are as many as 28 modes of inquiry, but most fall into 1 of 5 categories: narrative, phenomenology, ethnography, case study, and grounded theory.  The 28 genres are usually grouped into one of two broader genres titled: interpretive and critical thinking.

Interpretive Studies are studies that seek "to understand a situation from the perspective of the participant" (Phillips 85).  Narrative, phenomenology, ethnography, case study, grounded theory, and action research all fall within this category.  Critical Thinking are studies "concerned with empowering human beings to transcend the constraints placed on them by race, class, and gender" (Phillips 85).  This broader genre includes feminist, deconstruction, postmodern, popular culture, and critical ethnography.

According to Phillips, data collection of a qualitative study seeks to identify the purposefully selected site or individuals for the proposed study and indicates the types of data to be collected.  There are four types of data: observation, interviews, documents, and audio/visual materials.  To analyze the data that was collected there is a three step process: 1) it is ongoing that involves reflection about the data, questions, and writing memos throughout the duration of the study, 2) it involves open-ended data, and 3) researchers must tailor the data analysis beyond the generic approaches.

The data presented must be reliable and validates.  In order to validate the data, you can either use triangulation (3 analysis types used in the study), member-checking (participants provide feedback to check the accuracy of the data collected), thick description (writes richly so that readers made experience the study), bias clarification (clears any researcher bias), differing perspective (provides a different perspective that counters the theme), prolonged time (spend in-depth time), peer briefing (another person reviews and asks questions about the collected data), and external auditor (someone new to the researcher reviews the project).

Qualitative Research is flexible.  The format of a qualitative study often changes as questions and responses dictate the course of the study.  There are 5 pieces of "machinery," as Phillips calls it, that work behind a qualitative study: 1) Time, 2) Subjectivity, 3) What does not fit, 4) Relationships, and 5) Context.

According to Mertler in Chapter 4: Developing a Research Plan, we are now looking at what is the last part of the planning stage in developing a plan.  We must ask research questions that will help guide our study.  First, the researcher must determine if the study will be qualitative, quantitative, or mixed.  If the researcher chooses to perform a qualitative research study, the study will be guided by only research questions that will most likely be stated throughout the study once they begin to collect data.  But if the researcher chooses to perform a quantitative research study, it will be guides by either researcher questions or hypotheses.  Mertler defines a research question as "the fundamental question inherent in the research topic under investigation."

Mertler confirms what Phillips stated in that the most common qualitative designs used in a study are case studies, ethonographies, and phenomenological studies.

Sunday, July 14, 2013

Week 3 - Beginning an Action Research Project

This week I learned that there are three Action Research genres, according to Kenneth H. Phillips, the author of "Exploring Research in Music Education and Music Therapy." The three genres are listed as: 1) technical, 2) practical, and 3) emancipatory.

In the technical genre of action research, "the researcher tests a particular invention used by a practitioner in the field" (Phillips 318).  There is usually an expertise in this genre that the participants reply on.  The technical genre is effective and efficient.  One of the goals of the technical genre is to "produce change in social practice" (Phillips 318).

In the practical genre of action research, "the researcher and practitioner come together to identify potential problems, underlying causes, and possible solutions" (Phillips 318).  The practitioner is encouraged to participate instead of watching as a bystander.  The practitioner then becomes self-reflective in the process.

In the emancipatory genre of action research, "no hierarchy exists between the researcher and the practitioner" (Phillips 318).  The expert participates in the study as a process moderator.  Because there is no hierarchy, there develops a "closeness between the problem and the theory used to explain and resolve it" (Phillips 318).

According to Phillips, there are many common characteristics between all three genres of action research.  All three genres do not generalize the results to a population, are mostly written in the qualitative format, and collectively are viewed as a weak, if not the weakest, form of research.  However, even though action research is considered the weakest form of research, it does not diminish the impact that the research can make in the classroom setting.

There is a 4 part process to action research: 1) plan, 2) action, 3) observation, and 4) reflection.  When beginning an action research study, we must plan the study.  We must identify the problem.  Then we must take action and determine what activity should be used in the study.  Afterwards, we must observe during the study and then end with reflection.  We must reflect not only on the results of the study, but on ourselves as well!

According to Craig A. Mertler, the author of "Action Research: Improving Schools and Empowering Educators," to begin an action research study, the first step is to identify the topic that should be investigated.  The topics can range from "classroom environment" to" grading and evaluation."  As a teacher and researcher, you must be invested in the topic that you chose.  You should chose a topic that interests you as well as pertains to your situation in the classroom.  The topic you chose should not be too vague or too narrow.  The topic needs to be focused and flexible. 

The next step should be to research existing articles and information on the topic of your study.  While researching existing information, talk to your other teachers at your school as well as in the surrounding schools in your area.  They might have conducted a similar study in the past and can offer input and advice.  Or they might also be interested in the topic and help perform the study!  Also consult with administrators and counselors as well.  

While gathering information, we must examine our own beliefs about the topic we wish to study.  According to Mertler, this is called reconnaissance.  Reconnaissance has three forms: 1) self-reflection, 2) description, and 3) explanation.  

After gathering preliminary information, start by reviewing related literature.  According to Johnson, a literature review is "an examination of journal articles, ERIC documents, books, and other sources related to your action research project" (Johnson 75).  Reviewing Literature will help you chose your topic and narrow the focus.  In addition, you may find previous studies conducted on your topic that will provide a format to follow when conducting your own study! 

Sunday, July 7, 2013

Week 2

This week we discussed more specific steps of Action Research.  Merkler stated that there are 4 broad steps: 1) The Planning Stage, 2) The Acting Stage, 3) The Developing Stage, and 4) The Reflecting Stage.  Within these 4 broad steps are 9 specific steps.

Within The Planning Stage we have a) identifying and limiting the topic, b) gathering information, c) reviewing the related literature, and d) developing a research plan.  These steps help us plan the study that we wish to begin.  Within The Acting Stage are steps e) implementing the plan and collecting the data, and f) analyzing the data.  These are done while we are researching.  The Developing Stage has only one subsection: g) developing an action plan.  After the research is analyzed, we must then decide how to put the research to use.  The Reflecting Stage has 2 subsections: h) sharing and communicating the results, and i) reflecting on the process.  We must share our results.  It can be shared with fellow teachers at a faculty meeting or in a journal.  In addition, as educators and researchers, we must reflect on what we have learned and how it can be changed.  In that sense, Action Research is cyclical.  We are always reviewing and changing and gathering more data.


In Phillips' book, "Exploring Research in Music Education and Music  Therapy," we discussed The Research Study.  Phillips states that there are three main groups of people who do research in music education and therapy: 1) College and University Professors, 2) Teachers and Therapists, and 3) Clinical Researchers.

Phillips then proceeds to break down the research article.  The Article always has a title and author(s).  The title is important and should give us some idea of what the study involves.  It should summarize the main ideas of the study and be 10-12 words at the most.  After the title is stated, the names of the author(s) and their place of affiliation should be listed.

Following the title and author(s) is the abstract which provides us a brief summary of what we should expect the study to be about.  Then comes the introduction which should answer the  following questions: 1) What is the study about? 2) What is the theoretical basic underlying the study? 3) Does the study relate to previous work or literature? 4) Is the need fore the research presented clearly?  and 5) Are the research questions clear?  (Phillips 21).

The method follows the introduction and describes how the study was conducted.  We must have a clear idea of subjects or participants that were included in the study.  How many, how they were chosen, gender, grade level, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and grouping factors are all things that should be stated within the article.

Materials should be clearly stated.  The Procedures of the study should be listed in detail.  That includes how the data was collected and analyzed.  Results should follow in both quantitative and qualitative studies.  The Discussion should wrap up the article.  It should state what was found and how it was interpreted and why.  The references end the article in the form of APA.

Phillips goes on to state that there is a factor of trust in an article.  We should trust refereed articles more than those who are not peer-reviewed. In addition, he gives us some warning signs that we should be aware of: 1)Technical problems within the article, 2) sampling of the participants, 3) lack of replication (is it a one time study?), 4) conflicts of interest, 5) carelessness (is the article sloppy?), and 6) errors and poor scholarship within the article  (Phillips 27-28).

This week, we had to review an article titled, "Career Influences of Music Education Audition Candidates" by David A. Rickels, Wesley D. Brewer, Kimberly H. Councill, William E. Fredrickson, Michelle Hairston, David L. Perry, Ann M. Porter, and Margaret Schmidt.  The article was incredibly interesting and really pertained to what we do as teachers.  The authors discovered that the most influential person on whether a student becomes a music education major or not, is the student's high school music ensemble teacher.  The students usually audition to become a high school teacher in whatever their primary background is: either chorus, orchestra, or band.  This is consistent with many other studies that were performed on undergraduate students who stated the same reasons for becoming music education majors.  In addition, the authors state that some communication about careers in music is done by high school teachers and that was an influence on students as well.  However, not a lot of communication on careers in music is done in the earlier grades and that should be changed in order to inspire students to become general music teachers.